HomeProfileServicesProjectsNewsBlogContact

Posts Tagged ‘Water’

A Thriving Economy Means More Problems for China’s Water

July 15th, 2010 by Sarah Taylor

Today, a booming economy should be looked at as a savior. But for China, it’s also a burden. That’s because more factories, people, agriculture, and entertainment all require extreme uses of water.

Sherwood Design Engineers hopes to combat this problem within our city-scale project in Langfang, located in Northern China.  We have developed a master plan for a balanced water cycle, which would improve water quality, mitigate further aquifer depletion, and regenerate wildlife habitat in the Northern China Plain. We hope that this plan will set the precedent for all cities throughout China.

Sherwood has recommended that the Northern China Plain eliminate imported water from the South-North Water Diversion Project (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7864390.stm). This project includes eastern, central and western routes that will divert water from China’s Yangtze River to the parched north.  There are many issues related to this plan, including financial and environmental.  A few of these problems are tremendous water shortage in the form of droughts as well as sinking due to over pumping from its aquifers. The new balanced water cycle plan would reduce aquifer pumping and would allow for groundwater to recharge from natural infiltration, recycled water, and diverted peak storm flows.

You can read about China’s water shortages here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503564.html

Sherwood’s West Coast Green Panel in NYT

November 26th, 2008 by Andy M.
110 Embarcadero. Courtesy of Pelli Clarke Pelli

110 Embarcadero. Courtesy of Pelli Clarke Pelli

Writer Allison Arieff’s most recent By Design column for the New York Times - “Blue is the New Green” - discusses the importance of water, and mentions the panel we gave at this year’s West Coast Green conference:

Although 70 percent of the earth is covered with water, just 3 percent of that water is fit for human consumption. This isn’t going to improve anytime soon. Failures in water-related infrastructure result in lost biodiversity, higher temperatures, increased flooding, massive impact on energy and unsafe, unsanitary water.

But important advances have been made in water resource management — and they are far more compelling than the term “water resource management” would suggest. (Earlier this year, a panel at the sustainability conference West Coast Green was titled “The Sexiest Large Scale Design Applications We Have Ever Seen.”)

On the panel, Bry Sarte joined Paul Kephart of Rana Creek to bring some sex appeal to “Water Resource Management” and “Water-Related Infrastructure,” terms which may not exactly role off the tongue or come up often in cocktail chatter, but are increasingly becoming critical concerns for everybody.

In her column, Arieff discusses several issues that we covered on the panel, and routinely deal with in our work, including:

  • Treating water as a resource instead of a waste.
  • Building multiple uses for water into our designs.
  • Recognizing that Water=Energy, and balancing the two.

She also lists several strategies to accomplish these goals including Living Roofs, Living Walls, Greywater Reuse, and Rainwater Harvesting. The photographs demonstrate that these designs can be both beautiful and practical.

In discussing his work designing the Living Roof for the Academy of Science, Paul Kephart noted that, “We have 42 acres of impervious surface in San Francisco. With 29 acres of roofs we could solve forever the runoff issues.” This would not only save water, but energy and money as well; while improving the health of the city.

Fortunately, this type of thinking is catching on. The California Public Utilities Commission is exploring water-energy efficiency programs:

The CPUC’s Water Action Plan calls for strengthening water conservation programs to a level comparable to the energy efficiency achieved by energy utilities. The Water Action Plan specifically calls for a 10 percent reduction in energy consumption by water utilities, emphasizes the importance of reducing the amount of energy needed by water utilities for water pumping, purification systems, and other water processes such as desalination, and encourages programs to reduce energy waste by water utilities from causes such as system leaks, poorly maintained equipment, defective meters, unused machines left idling, and improperly operated systems.

And it’s not just government agencies and designers that are finding the “sex appeal” in water design. As the dozens and dozens of thoughtful comments to Ms. Arieff’s column indicate - people all across the country are interested in making “Blue the New Green.”

Sherwood's West Coast Green Panel in NYT

November 26th, 2008 by Andy M.
110 Embarcadero. Courtesy of Pelli Clarke Pelli

110 Embarcadero. Courtesy of Pelli Clarke Pelli

Writer Allison Arieff’s most recent By Design column for the New York Times - “Blue is the New Green” - discusses the importance of water, and mentions the panel we gave at this year’s West Coast Green conference:

Although 70 percent of the earth is covered with water, just 3 percent of that water is fit for human consumption. This isn’t going to improve anytime soon. Failures in water-related infrastructure result in lost biodiversity, higher temperatures, increased flooding, massive impact on energy and unsafe, unsanitary water.

But important advances have been made in water resource management — and they are far more compelling than the term “water resource management” would suggest. (Earlier this year, a panel at the sustainability conference West Coast Green was titled “The Sexiest Large Scale Design Applications We Have Ever Seen.”)

On the panel, Bry Sarte joined Paul Kephart of Rana Creek to bring some sex appeal to “Water Resource Management” and “Water-Related Infrastructure,” terms which may not exactly role off the tongue or come up often in cocktail chatter, but are increasingly becoming critical concerns for everybody.

In her column, Arieff discusses several issues that we covered on the panel, and routinely deal with in our work, including:

  • Treating water as a resource instead of a waste.
  • Building multiple uses for water into our designs.
  • Recognizing that Water=Energy, and balancing the two.

She also lists several strategies to accomplish these goals including Living Roofs, Living Walls, Greywater Reuse, and Rainwater Harvesting. The photographs demonstrate that these designs can be both beautiful and practical.

In discussing his work designing the Living Roof for the Academy of Science, Paul Kephart noted that, “We have 42 acres of impervious surface in San Francisco. With 29 acres of roofs we could solve forever the runoff issues.” This would not only save water, but energy and money as well; while improving the health of the city.

Fortunately, this type of thinking is catching on. The California Public Utilities Commission is exploring water-energy efficiency programs:

The CPUC’s Water Action Plan calls for strengthening water conservation programs to a level comparable to the energy efficiency achieved by energy utilities. The Water Action Plan specifically calls for a 10 percent reduction in energy consumption by water utilities, emphasizes the importance of reducing the amount of energy needed by water utilities for water pumping, purification systems, and other water processes such as desalination, and encourages programs to reduce energy waste by water utilities from causes such as system leaks, poorly maintained equipment, defective meters, unused machines left idling, and improperly operated systems.

And it’s not just government agencies and designers that are finding the “sex appeal” in water design. As the dozens and dozens of thoughtful comments to Ms. Arieff’s column indicate - people all across the country are interested in making “Blue the New Green.”